Project 2007 Major bug

Thank you for this information.

I found a few problems when I updated my 2003 books to 2007.

1. Only single day nonwork periods could be made repeating.
2. Grouping did not work with Custom Outline Codes when multiple levels were used. The description is corrupted.
3. I was informed that the Group Resources had an issue with it.
4. When MSP2007 is loaded with Primavera 5/6 one can no longer import MSP files into Primavera.

Paul E Harris
Eastwood Harris Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
Planning and Scheduling Training Manual & Book Publishers & Consulting
www.eh.com.au

I’ve found out another problem. When you change remaining duration, and all three of the remaining duration, actual duration and duration are not the same type (ellapsed or normal), your actual duration would change.

Had you ever had a look at Start Slack or Finish Slack help topics of the software? it says that free slack = min (start slack, finish slack), but it’s not true; total slack = (start slack, finish slack).


Nader Khorrami Rad
khorramirad.com

I have noticed on this forum that people are getting confused with the proper critical path terms.

Microsoft did not invent the techniques nad its calculation engine has allways been suspect.

Microsoft Project is a tool which purports to use critical path method to calculate Float (what Microsoft calls Slack !!)


The basis principles dont change just because the software wallers at Microsoft dont understand the basic principles of critical path.

I suggest that first time users of critical path software, learn the basic principle, before ! they pick up the software

There are a number of books on the subject.

But dont expect to use the Project help files to teach you critical path. That will only tell how Microsoft does it and is not always reliable. Get a professional book on the subject or get yourselves trained

Tom Hadley
CEO
The Project Management Workshop

Calm down Tom,

The sobject is that there’s error in that help, and this should not happen.

Nader Khorrami Rad
khorramirad.com

Yes

You are right it shouldnt happen. These forums are meant to assist each other with our professional skills I thought. Yes we should assist by letting each other know the bugs in the software.

There are lots of errors in Project Help and the software.

In the country that I live in, if a product is sold as fit for purpose then it has to be fit for purpose !!!. The projects that I work on do not get paid unless the final result is complete and the quality is correct.

Yet Microsoft and other software companies can release half baked half tested products, charge full price and expect the users to test and let thme knwo about bugs we find.

I for one am fed up of the marketing hype that occurs which does not reflect the reality of the final product.

I need a tool that works, not one like a hammer that the head keeps falling off.

You’re right, but we all need to be tolerant; Our own projects are not ideal too ;)


Nader Khorrami Rad
khorramirad.com

Also if you create a new Bar Style the Name you assign does not stick. Instead in changes to something else.

And you can’t create pdf’s with the 3D shading on.

Tom,
The best way to avoid MSP2007 bugs and inconsisstencies is NOT TO USE it!

Ray,
wjich pdf generatot are you using?
Alexandre

I agree, unforynatley many of my clients insist on using it.

I also operate from a set of principles which says if software is sold to do something, and some poor misguided people the lie .

I belive it is one of my jobs as a professional to not let Microsoft get away with it.

YEs Primavera is a superior tool for most things

Tom,
a funny thing: I was yesterday with Primavera french PAR to get delivery of a P6 package; the guy I was with was insisting that I tell him wich project scheduling package is the best and the worst, Primavera excluded; when I said what I think the worst was, he replied "ok, this one excluded too"
Wich is the best, wich is the worst?
Alexandre

I think if you can combine: P6, with the scheduling and global change capabilities from the old P3; calculated fields, macro’s, and simulation capabilities from Pertmaster V8; with Crystal Reports (going through the regular security layers) on top, you would have a pretty strong tool. At least something I would be willing to pay serious money for.

Without any doubt, the worst tool in the world is MS Project; it should be redesigned from scratch (by people who understand scheduling) because the summary task mechanism is a fundamental architectural blunder. The way Microsoft dilutes established scheduling terminology and the erroneous results this product produces (since two decades!) is an insult to the professional schedulers community, or any other business customer.

Which is best which is worst, there you go...

Niek.

P.S. Alexandre, merci bien for your advise on Crystal Reports, GREAT product, I love it!

Niek,
you’re welcome "tout le plaisir est pour moi"(*)
I’ve told the PAR guy that the best scheduling software was Powerproject and the worst (oh, I can’t even spell that name!)
Alexandre
(*) moderator, I know writing in French is forbidden, but please do not write this off

Alexandre,
when do you plan to try Spider Project?
I am interested in your oppinion.
Regards,
Vladimir

Vladimir,
you’re too kind, I am just a poor lonesome & self-employed PM consultant; OK, I swear on my PC’s keyboard that I will take one day before year’s end to work on Spider, an dI will report just after.
Aleksandr (Sacha)

Thank you, Sasha.
Inform me when you will plan to do it and I will send some instructions to make the process easier and faster.
Vladimir

Vlad,
I will travel from nov 24 to dec 6 and have some spare time at night. I am going to take this opportunity to play with Spider.
Please send anything you think usefull for me to work easily with Spider.
afaulxbriole@orange.fr
Sasha (Aleksandr)

Thank you all for particapting in this discussion . I believe it is important to share our views. I agree, the best available proper package at present is Primavera. I ahv enot tried spider but here good things about it.

My main grouch with Microsoft, is that as a result of the way they market it, this denigrates our profession , they try to make out that with their tool, any one can plan and schedule. As we all know this is not the case.

Unforunaltey I am often stuck with a client who uses it , so I believe that the product should work.

Thanks again

Asking the question which is the best is a little like sayin gwhich is the best car . We say "horses for courses " the tool needs to fit the job. Organisations also need to look at the whole project management process not just the tool, theey need to look at theior procedure, and staffing

Bye now

Now now guys and gals, you are all slagging of nice Microsoft Project, and it is my favorite software. I make a living as a Primavera Dealer. If microsoft project worked I would be out of a job. So well done Microsoft! Clearly Project 2007 is another fabulous sales and marketing tool for Primavera. No change there then