Skip to content

Successor

V KuttyMember for 16 years 10 months
Created
7
2
0
Hi,

I have a question.

We are using negative lags for example design to be finalised 60 days before Manufacture of First unit.

Manucture unit one FS(-60) Finalise design

Here the Predecessor of Finalise design is Manufacture unit one. What could I use as its successor so that Float values are good and real.

Thanks,

Vijay

7 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Shah. HB ·
    Hi vijay

    Try to avoid negative lags .If Finalized Design is required prior to manufacturing unit.
    You can revise the link

    Finalized Design {Predecessor} FS+60 days lag [If required] with Manufacture unit {Successor}
  2. 0
    Gary Whitehead ·
    Logic should be
    Finalise design FS(0) to Place Order FS(0) to Manufacture FS(0) to delivery FS(0) to Install.

    There may be FAT or quality checks in there too.

    If this logic gives you a delivery date significantly in advance of when you will be ready to install, you can make order, manufacture & delivery ALAP or zero float activities.
  3. 0
    Shah. HB ·
    Hi Vijay


    In addition to Gray advice, breaking down activities as mention by Gray helps to reduce usage of high lag values and your schedule becomes more realistic.On updating it yields better solutions for foreseeing delays .
  4. 0
    V Kutty ·
    Thanks, any advice is welcome.

    I am also keen on learning how to encorporate costs into Primavera what are the ways to do this?

    Regards,

    Vijay
  5. 0
    Rodel Marasigan ·
    Hi V Kutty,
    I uploaded to snips basic steps for entering budget to P6, link below:
    Basic Steps in Entering Budget
  6. 0
    Shah. HB ·
    Thanks Rodel

    I was just looking for this procedure,as I am on the way of using P6
  7. 0
    V Kutty ·
    Thanks Rodel, much appreciated.

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?