Tendor Program
In the Open Standard
AV
Arun VasanthMember for 17 years
- Created
- 13
- 1
0
13 replies
Oldest first- 0SHShah. HB ·Hi Vasanth
Tender programme is a level 1 programme.you can check the below WBS.
You can make simple one with few activities not in detail.For example in a floor you can mention duration required for civil works and mep works then close the WBS
1.General [ NTP, Mobilisation, etc ]
2.Milestones
2.1 Contractual Milestones [Readiness of chillers for operation, Readiness of MV system to reactive power , etc ]
2.2 Project Milestone [ Power ON, Water & Drainage connection, etc ]
3.Information release/Design Availability
4.Free issue Items
5.Statutory Authority NOC’s
6.Provisional Sum
7.Engineering Details [Shop drawings, materials & method statements submission & approvals]
8.Procurement Management [ Order, mgf & Shipment ]
9.Civil Construction –Substructure, superstructure & External works
10. MEP Installations
11. Testing & Commissioning
12. Project Closeout
- 0THTom Howard ·What are you planning ???
What is the purpose of the tender programme ? It may be to give your own company assurance that you can deliver the scheme in a particular period. It may be to prove to a Client you are a competent contractor...
If for a competitive tender, you need to decide how much float or slack to build into the programme. This is a careful balance of risk v winning the bid. As I have discovered in recent months, Main Contractors are no longer submitting realistic programmes, and will routinely take 15 - 20% off the Client designated construction period. The projects CANNOT be built in this time, but it will win the bid.
The tender programme should reflect the amount of information available to you... no point doing a 500 line programme if you’ve just got 2 A3’s sketch drawings to go off.
Don’t get caught up in too much detail - this can be developed in the Construction Programme. This is where your planning experience in identifying the "critical activities" becomes invaluable.
A tender programme will usually contain (or be linked to) a Design or Procurement Programme. I use negative logic links, so if the contract start date or sequence changes, the Design Programme will be updated to suit. - 0MTMike Testro ·Hi Tom and Arun
A tender programme should be as detailed as time and resources allow.
You have both had 11 years planning experience so you should be aware of the Bottom Up Method.
I have had this discussion many times in earlier threads and using correct bottom up planning it is possible to create a very detailed Four Level Resourced programme very quickly.
In a recent thread I boasted that I could prepare a -2 basement +8 level concrete residential structure complete with detailed M&E in 90 minutes.
I failed - it took me 135 minutes.
Even with schematic drawings it is possible to work in detail provided you know how to build it.
In another case I only had an artists drawing for a holiday resort but I knew the required construction sequence so I was able to plan it.
The rule is "don’t guess it when you CAN plan it"
Best regards
Mike Testro - 0MTMike Testro ·Hi Arun
You have been planning for 11 years - how long have you been building things like hotels?
Think about the problem - what is the first thing to put on the programme > then what next > and so on until completion.
By going straight into level 1 you are just guessing and you could be horribly wrong - good luck anyway.
Best regards
Mike Testro - 0THTom Howard ·(Thought I’d post the reply here as well to continue the thread)
Thanks Mike,
Guess I do programmes using both Top Down and Bottom Up… can’t say there is a particular approach I adopt to each scheme. Certainly at present, it would be pointless to do Bottom Up and produce a sensible, realistic programme for use in a tender – we would never win the job. We are having to take approx 15-20% out of the realistic programme period (or Client designated period) to be in with a shout. Contracts Managers & PM’s just have to make the programme work somehow once on site. In that respect then, I suppose most of my programmes are Top Down (we know what crazy period will give us a chance of getting called to interview etc). Unfortunately everyone has adopted this strategy, and it will be making for a very contractually aggressive period in the industry.
Cheers for the demo. Wondering now how many other things have got official “methodology” names ??? - 0THTom Howard ·To answer my last question - just reading an interesting document on line about planning
http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/BLT/BUE_Docs/Peter_Hegarty_et_al.pdf
come across the Acronym PSPD’s...
for those who don’t know (Pictorial Phased Diagrams). Why anyone would think writing or saying "PSPD" is easier than "Phasing Plan", God only knows - but it would surely make you sound very intellectual in a meeting and impress everyone round the table...
Log in or join to reply
ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.
Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?