Skip to content

Gap in activties

Abdullah ChoudhryMember for 12 years 9 months
Created
7
5
0

If you see the attached image there is a gap betwen the activities. I am unable to find the solution for this, pls help.

Regards

Abdullah

7 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Mike Testro ·

    Hi Abdullah - Welcome to

    Hi Abdullah - Welcome to Planning Planet.

    Sorry but no image on the screen.

    There could be a number of reasons for a visible gap between tasks.

    You should check the following:

    Non work periods on calendars - resources have calendars too.

    Lead lags on links.

    Folding some Non Work periods on the horizontal time scale

    Best regards

    Mike Testro

  2. 0
    Andrew Pearce ·

    Another option is that you

    Another option is that you are using retained logic when schedulling

  3. 0
    Mike Testro ·

    Hi AndrewWhat's retained

    Hi Andrew

    What's retained logic?

    I forgot the most obvious possibility - there are Must Start On Constraints.

    Best regards

    Mike Testro

  4. 0
    Abdullah Choudhry ·

    Thanks :) I googled retained

    Thanks :) I googled retained logic and got the answer. Quite helpful. Retained logic was checked when I run the scheduled when I checked progressive override the problem was solved. Thanks guy.
  5. 0
    Mike Testro ·

    Hi AbdullahI suspected that

    Hi Abdullah

    I suspected that you were using P6 at the begining and you did not mention that you had a progressed project.

    In Asta PowerProject there is a facility to re-link around tasks that are completed out of sequence thus avoining the retained Logic problem which seems to be a unique P6 problem.

    Best regards

    Mike Testro

  6. 0
    Gary Whitehead ·

    Abdullah, Changing from

    Abdullah,

     

    Changing from retained logic to progress overide may have solved your gap issue, but it has not solved the root cause of the problem, only hidden it.

     

    The root cause is that you have out of sequence (OOS) working.  (e.g. you have an activity started with a FS predeccesor that has not finished)

    You should review all progressed activites for broken logic, and correct that logic. Until you do so, you cannot be certain that the forecast dates Primavera is calculating are correct.

     

    Cheers,

     

    G

  7. 0
    Gary Whitehead ·

    Hi Mike, I fear your loathing

    Hi Mike,

     

    I fear your loathing of Primavera has lead to a slightly biased response, there!

     

    Progress overide and retained logic are two options Primavera provides to deal with OOS. Linking around tasks is another option Asta provides. None of these are guaranteed to generate the correct model, but arguably Primavera's options give the user more flexibility than Asta's.

    The only way is to be sure is to fix the broken logic. -It will always require human intervention to decide how best to re-sequence when the planned logic has not been followed.

     

    Cheers,


    G

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?