Earned Value and Duration % Complete
In the Open Standard
Dean MulliganMember for 19 years 7 months
- Created
- 1
- 1
0
on my project the guys are trying to get the programme cost loaded to meet the clients requirements regarding EV. And are having trouble, mostly due to a disconnect between the cost breakdown and the WBS - costs are at a high level only - thats their problem!
What my problem is that the % Complete used is Duration % Complete.
I have only used Physical % Complete before for EV analysis, is it possible to use Duration % Complete ????
Does Primavera V5 calculate it and does it roll up properly???
cheers
deano
What my problem is that the % Complete used is Duration % Complete.
I have only used Physical % Complete before for EV analysis, is it possible to use Duration % Complete ????
Does Primavera V5 calculate it and does it roll up properly???
cheers
deano
1 reply
Oldest first- 0David Kelly ·There is no distinction between using either Physical % or Duration % complete in order to set Performance % complete (which is how P5 calculates Earned Value)
Duration % complete DOES roll up "properly" - but I cannot imagine what you would use that for if the client understands EVA - why not just roll up Performance % complete?
Log in or join to reply
ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.
Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?