Revised Programme-Clause 14.2
In the Open Standard
Khalil MasoudMember for 19 years
- Created
- 1
- 3
0
According to clause 14.2, the Engineer can ask the Contractor to submit a revised programme if the actual progress doesnt conform to the original programme. I have two enquieries:
1) Is the new revised programme considered a "new baseline"? or we have to stick to the original consented baseline.
2) If the original baseline cannot be contractually chenged, how it can be used as a reference to assess claims even it is not doable anymore?
Thank you
1) Is the new revised programme considered a "new baseline"? or we have to stick to the original consented baseline.
2) If the original baseline cannot be contractually chenged, how it can be used as a reference to assess claims even it is not doable anymore?
Thank you
1 reply
Oldest first- 0Roger Gibson ·Khalil,
Presumably progress of the works is behind the original programme and in critical delay, and in the Engineer’s opinion the delay has been caused by the contractor.
You should submit.
1. A current progress update of the opriginal baseline programme, showing a new forecast completion date.
2. If you, the contractor, considers that all or some of the critical delay to the project completion date is the responsibility of the Employer/Client, then submit the necessary details of the delay.
3. Submit a ’new’ baseline programme showing a ’new’ forecast completion date. This will show a recovery of the critical delay caused by the contractor or the best-possible ’new’ completion date and accepting some of the critical delay to date.
Roger Gibson
Log in or join to reply
ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.
Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?