As-built-but-for in practice
In the Open Standard
David WaddleMember for 23 years 8 months
- Created
- 2
- 5
0
In using a simple abbf analysis how would you handle the subject of construction drawing issues?
For example imagine an activity was planned to take 6 weeks but actually took 12 weeks to complete. During the currency of the activity there were several drawings issued from the design team.
Then suppose the activity is ’1st fix electrical’ and the drawings are for floor boxes, containment and high level trays.
Planned: xxxxxx
Actual: xxxxxxxxxxxx
Drawing issues: x x x x
With such a mis-match in the basic level of detail for the as-built construction activity, compared to the high level of detail for the drawing issues; is it possible to use the abbf method?
What do you think PPers?
For example imagine an activity was planned to take 6 weeks but actually took 12 weeks to complete. During the currency of the activity there were several drawings issued from the design team.
Then suppose the activity is ’1st fix electrical’ and the drawings are for floor boxes, containment and high level trays.
Planned: xxxxxx
Actual: xxxxxxxxxxxx
Drawing issues: x x x x
With such a mis-match in the basic level of detail for the as-built construction activity, compared to the high level of detail for the drawing issues; is it possible to use the abbf method?
What do you think PPers?
2 replies
Oldest first- 0David Waddle ·Unfortunately my diagram didn’t appear as I had drawn it, which may have confused people. Try this:
Planned................XXXXXX
Actual...............................XXXXXXXXXXXX
Drawing issuess.....X...X..X......X...........X
Make more sense now? By the way, this isn’t a job that I had planned.
Log in or join to reply
ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.
Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?