Skip to content
ProjectControls.com
Forensic Claims Analysis

No Subject Specified

In the Open Standard
Khawaja UddinMember for 20 years 8 months
Created
3
2
0
There are four different techniques to do the delay analysis
1-As-Planned Vs As-Built
2-Impacted As-Planned
3-Collapsed As-Built
4-Time Impact Analysis

My question are as follows,

Are these technique used under different circumstances?

or any of the technique can be used ,as we wish ?

WEhich one is most preferrable and acceptable technique widely used?
I will appreciate the answers
Thanks n Rgds
Save Follow Follow forum Report
Reply New topic

3 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Oliver Melling ·
    #1
    khawaja uddin,

    Try reading this, you might find it useful.

    AACE International Recommended Practice No. 29R-03
    FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS
    Report
  2. 0
    Oliver Melling ·
    #2
    Page 101 shows when it is best to use each method.
    Report
  3. 0
    Mike Testro ·
    #3
    Hi All

    The original post was:

    There are four different techniques to do the delay analysis

    1-As-Planned Vs As-Built
    Best used when Sub-Contract work is compressed between other trades.
    2-Impacted As-Planned
    Used for on-going work
    3-Collapsed As-Built
    Completely unreliable - don’t even go there.
    4-Time Impact Analysis
    Best for forensic analysis but must have accurate As Buit data to be effective.

    I hope this is clear

    Best regards

    Mike Testro
    Report

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Log inJoin free

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?