Recommended Reading: SCL Paper D95 - David Barry
In the Open Standard
David WallaceMember for 21 years 4 months
- Created
- 1
- 6
0
I have just finished re-reading David Barry’s excellent paper entitled "Beware the Dark Arts! Delay Analysis and the Problems with Reliance on Technology"
There are some good discussion points within the paper, that do not detract from the thrust of the text.
One, which I find quite interesting, is David’s point on what he refers to as "A mechanistic delay analysis methodology..." where he discusses Time Impact Analysis and the principle that a variation issued well in advance of the effect of that variation could be used as a ’cover’ for the Contractors culpable delays. (Page 7 of the paper if anyone has it)
www.scl.org.uk
There are some good discussion points within the paper, that do not detract from the thrust of the text.
One, which I find quite interesting, is David’s point on what he refers to as "A mechanistic delay analysis methodology..." where he discusses Time Impact Analysis and the principle that a variation issued well in advance of the effect of that variation could be used as a ’cover’ for the Contractors culpable delays. (Page 7 of the paper if anyone has it)
www.scl.org.uk
1 reply
Oldest first- 0Charleston-Joseph Orbe ·I read the paper long time ago.
It is not championing Mike’s belove and simplistic "Impacted as-planned Analysis Method".
Mike what can you say when one of your brethen have this opnion that Impacted as Planned is not really
"... the Method Recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol".
in fact the paper stated "... time impact analysis method ... is the method recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol.
cheers,
Charlie
Log in or join to reply
ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.
Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?