Skip to content
ProjectControls.com
Forensic Claims Analysis

Delay Analysis using Impacted As Planned Method

In the Open Standard
Prageeth ChandrasiriMember for 15 years 3 months
Created
2
5
0

Hi,

If you can, please give me some advice regarding this Delay Analysis Problem.  I used “Impacted As Planned” method to analyses delays.

For the very first delay Event, I just took the Baseline & Impact the Delay into that. Now, my Problem is for the Next Delay event, should I use the Baseline or Already Impacted Programme to demonstrate the Delay Analysis.

Thank You

Save Follow Follow forum Report
Reply New topic

2 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Mike Testro ·
    #1

    Hi Prageeth You should impact

    Hi Prageeth

    You should impact your delay events in strict chronological order of date of impact using the same chart in a rolling sequence.

    The date of impact is the last date that the impacted activity could start after the event has run its course.

    Bear in mind that the Impacted As Planned method as described in the SCL protocol 2002 is not to be used for Forensic Delay Analysis but only for Work in Progress.

    Best regards

    Mike Testro

    Report
  2. 0
    Khuong Do ·
    #2

    Hi,I write an article

    Hi,

    I write an article regarding How to perform Impacted As-Planned Delay Analysis in Primavera P6.

    If you're interested, kindly read it here https://doduykhuong.com/2016/09/19/how-to-perform-impacted-as-planned-delay-analysis-in-primavera-p6/

    Report

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Log inJoin free

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?