Skip to content
ProjectControls.com
Planning, Scheduling & Programming Discussion

So with concurrent delay, you get time but not money - but what if you need acceleration to stay on schedule?

In the Open Standard
John ReevesMember for 13 years 5 months
Created
2
2
0

With concurrent delay, you get time but not money - but what if you need acceleration to stay on schedule?  Do you have to pay them - why it was concurrent?  Cannot slide such as you simply cannot let the schedule slide due to once a year environmental issues you have to fit into.

Save Follow Follow forum Report
Reply New topic

2 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Peter Holroyd ·
    #1

    John,still struggle with

    John,

    still struggle with concurrent delay - or is it pacing or parallel? Did you realise at the time what it was or is it just in a retrospective analysis being done by somebody who was not there? Did it change from period to period? As you say, did you mitigate by acceleration without realising it and now the clever people want to claim some money back?

    Environmental work windows - given the way nature is changing a blanket stop seems out of date in the UK

    Report
  2. 0
    John Reeves ·
    #2

    I did some reading, and

    I did some reading, and basically if you have to accellerate in concurrent delay the contractor gets 50% of the accelleration costs.

    Report

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Log inJoin free

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?