Skip to content
ProjectControls.com
Forensic Claims Analysis

EOT preparation methodology?

In the Open Standard
Ajay KMember for 9 years 10 months
Created
2
4
0

Dear Experts

Project Scenario - 80% Planned duration surpassed , contractor providing further structural design changes to Sub-contract(**MEP) with existing delay events from contractor i.e ( late civil clearance, civil rework impact and pending approval for delivarables)

Please advise which is the better Delay claim methodology to implement in this type of scenario : As planned + As impacted OR as-built vs as impacted OR Window analysis ( P6 : Approved Baseline or Recovery programme (-) total set of delay events impacting = total duration required to complete overall project)  

**Note : My client is MEP subcontractor

Rgds

Ajay

    

Save Follow Follow forum Report
Reply New topic

2 replies

Oldest first
  1. 0
    Mike Testro ·
    #1

    Hi AjayHow complete are your

    Hi Ajay

    How complete are your as built records?

    How responsive is the baseline programme?

    What are your contract terms?

    These are just a few of the things that need to be considered when selecting a dely analysis method.

    The one method that works when there is no critical path and only rudimentary as built data is the Projected As Built method.

    A demonstration is available for download from my website - www.expertdelayanalysis.com - for £35.00.

    Best regards

    Mike Testro

    Report
  2. 0
    Ajay K ·
    #2

    Thanks Mike for the

    Thanks Mike for the advise.

    rgds

    Ajay

    Report

Log in or join to reply

ProjectControls.com is free to join. Members can post questions, reply, vote and follow discussions.

Log inJoin free

Existing members: your original username and password still work. Forgot password?